Suppose you are given two strings. You need to find the length of the longest common subsequence between these two strings.

A subsequence is a string formed by removing some characters from the original string while maintaining the relative position of the remaining characters. For example, “abd” is a subsequence of “abcd”, where the removed character is “c”.

If there is no common subsequence, then return 0.

Constraints:

• $1 \leq$ str1.length $\leq 500$
• $1 \leq$ str2.length $\leq 500$
• str1 and str2 contain only lowercase English characters.

So far, you’ve probably brainstormed some approaches and have an idea of how to solve this problem. Let’s explore some of these approaches and figure out which one to follow based on considerations such as time complexity and any implementation constraints.

A naive approach would be to compare the characters of both strings based on the following rules:

• If the current characters of both strings match, we move one position ahead in both strings.

• If the current characters of both strings do not match, we recursively calculate the maximum length of moving one character forward in any one of the two strings i.e., we check if moving a character forward in either the first string or the second will give us a longer subsequence.

• If we reach the end of either of the two strings, we return $0$.

The time complexity of the naive approach is $O(2^{m+n})$, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, respectively. The space complexity of this approach is $O(n + m)$.

We are going to solve this problem with the help of the top-down approach of dynamic programming. The top-down solution, commonly known as the memoization technique, is an enhancement of the recursive solution. It overcomes the problem of calculating redundant solutions over and over again by storing them in an array. In the recursive approach, the following two variables kept changing:

• The index, i, used to keep track of the current character in str1.

• The index, j, used to keep track of the current character in str2.

We will use a 2D table, dp, with $n$ rows and $m$ columns to store the result at any given state. $n$ represents the length of str1 and and $m$ represents the length of str2. At any later time, if we encounter the same subproblem, we can return the stored result from the table with an $O(1)$ lookup instead of recalculating that subproblem.

Let’s look at the following illustration to get a better understanding of the solution: