DevOps: Infrastructure orchestration vs. configuration management
Infrastructure orchestration
Orchestration manages multiple services, applications, systems, and tasks, but in DevOps, it's not only about merging multiple tasks. It builds a special DevOps workflow by involving multiple automated stages and tasks with appropriate resources to streamline the process.
Pros and cons of infrastructure orchestration
The pros and cons of infrastructure orchestration are as follows:
Configuration management
Configuration management is responsible for the evolution and automation of the system administration role. It brings automation to infrastructure management and deployment.
Pros and cons of configuration management
The pros and cons of configuration management are as follows:
Infrastructure orchestration vs. configuration management
The difference between infrastructure orchestration and configuration management is as follows:
Infrastructure orchestration | Configuration management | |
Purpose | It automates and streamline the management of infrastructure. | It ensures consistency and control over the configuration of software applications and infrastructure. |
Focus | It focuses on automating the infrastructure components. | It focuses on managing the configuration of infrastructures. |
Automation level | It automates on a high level by allowing for the dynamic allocation and deallocation of resources on demand. | It automates the configuration deployment. |
Timeframe | It operates at the border, higher level scope, and is involved in the initial setup and ongoing management of infrastructure throughout the system's lifecycle. | It operates at the granular level and is involved in maintaining and managing configuration details as the system evolves. |
Tools | Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, AWS CloudFormation, and Terraform | Ansible, Chef, Puppet, and SaltStack |
Free Resources
