Branching is a feature available in most modern version control systems.
Branching in other VCS’s can be an expensive operation in both time and disk space. In Git, branches are a part of your everyday development process. Git branches are effectively a pointer to a snapshot of your changes. When you want to add a new feature or fix a bug, no matter how big or how small, you spawn a new branch to encapsulate your changes.
This makes it harder for unstable code to get merged into the main code base, and it gives you the chance to clean up your future’s history before merging it into the main branch.
The diagram above visualizes a repository with two isolated lines of development, one for a small feature, and one for a longer-running feature. By developing them in branches, it’s not only possible to work on both of them in parallel, but it also keeps the main branch free from questionable code.
The implementation behind Git branches is much more lightweight than other version control system models. Instead of copying files from directory to directory, Git stores a branch as a reference to a commit. In this sense, a branch represents the tip of a series of commits. It’s not a container for commits. The history for a branch is extrapolated through the commit relationships.
As you read, remember that Git branches aren’t like
A branch represents an independent line of development. Branches serve as an abstraction for the edit/stage/commit process. You can think of them as a way to request a brand new working directory, staging area, and project history. New commits are recorded in the history for the current branch, which results in a fork in the history of the project.
git branch command lets you create, list, rename, and delete branches. It doesn’t let you switch between branches or put a forked history back together again. For this reason,
git branch is tightly integrated with the
git checkout and
git merge commands.
List all of the branches in your repository. This is synonymous with
git branch --list.
git branch <branch>
Create a new branch called
＜branch＞. This does not check out the new branch.
git branch -d <branch>
Delete the specified branch. This is a “safe” operation in that Git prevents you from deleting the branch if it has unmerged changes.
git branch -D <branch>
Force delete the specified branch, even if it has unmerged changes. This is the command to use if you want to permanently throw away all of the commits associated with a particular line of development.
git branch -m <branch>
Rename the current branch to
git branch -a
List all remote branches.
It’s important to understand that branches are just pointers to commits. When you create a branch, all Git needs to do is create a new pointer, it doesn’t change the repository in any other way. If you start with a repository that looks like this:
Then, you create a branch using the following command:
git branch experiment
The repository history remains unchanged. All you get is a new pointer to the current commit:
Note that this only creates the new branch. To start adding commits to it, you need to select it with
git checkout, and then use the standard
git add and
git commit commands.
Once you’ve finished working on a branch and have merged it into the main code base, you’re free to delete the branch without losing any history:
git branch -d experiment
However, if the branch hasn’t been merged, the above command will output an error message:
error: The branch 'experiment' is not fully merged.
This protects you from losing access to that entire line of development. If you really want to delete the branch (e.g., it’s a failed experiment), you can use the capital
git branch -D experiment
View all Courses