What is OCL?
OCL, known as object constraint language, is a
Why do we use OCL?
We use OCL for the following purposes:
It allows us to precisely define our software system's requirements, constraints, and behaviors.
It helps in the formal verification and validation of our software applications.
It removes unambiguity in our requirements by clarifying and simplifying complex constraints and properties.
It contributes to improved software quality by enforcing accurate and consistent behaviors.
Constraints in OCL
A constraint is a rule or limitation that defines a specific condition that must be met by our software system. We can describe three types of constraints using OCL:
Invariants
Pre-conditions
Post conditions
Let's discuss how can we represent each of these in OCL.
1. Invariant
An invariant is a constraint that is supposed to be proven true before and after the execution of an operation. To represent invariants in OCL language, we write:
context <ClassName>inv <InvariantName>: <expression>
context: The keyword used to specify the context within which a constraint defined.<ClassName>: The name of the class to which the constraint applies.inv: The keyword that represents the invariant.<InvariantName> (optional):The name of the invariant.<expression>: The invariant we want to impose on the class.
2. Pre-condition
A pre-condition is a constraint that is supposed to be proven true before an operation. To represent pre-conditions in OCL language, we write:
context <ClassName>:: <OperationName>pre <ConditionName>: <expression>
context: The keyword used to specify the context within which a constraint is defined.<ClassName>: The name of the class to which the constraint applies.<OperationName>: The name of the operation (along with its parameters) which we want to ensure meets the pre-condition.pre: The keyword that represents the pre-condition.<ConditionName> (optional): The name of the pre-condition.<expression>: The pre-condition we want to impose on the class.
3. Post condition
A post condition is a constraint that is supposed to be proven true after an operation. To represent post conditions in OCL language, we write:
context <ClassName>:: <OperationName>post <ConditionName>: <expression>
context: The keyword used to specify the context within which a constraint is defined.<ClassName>: The name of the class to which the constraint applies.<OperationName>: The name of the operation (along with its parameters) which we want to ensure meets the post condition.post: The keyword that represents the post condition.<ConditionName> (optional): The name of the post condition.<expression>: The post condition we want to impose on the class.
Example
Let's discuss an example to understand constraint representation in OCL. Suppose we have a UML diagram with two classes: Employee and Company.
If we have an invariant that each Employee working in the Company should have an age greater than 22, we represent this in OCL as:
context Employeeinv: self.name > 22
Here, we are referring to the attribute name of the Employee's class, so we write the Employee class as context. The keyword self is optional and refers to attributes within the context class.
Note: We cannot write the constraint for attribute or function of classes other than the context class defined.
If we have a pre-condition that the
incrementparameter of theincreaseSalaryfunction should be greater than 0 before the execution of the function, we represent this in OCL as:
context Employee::increaseSalary(increment: Real)pre: increment > 0
If we have a post condition that after executing the
increaseSalaryfunction, thesalaryattribute of the employee should be greater than his previous salary, we represent this in OCL as:
context Employee::increaseSalary(increment: Real)post: self.salary > self.salary@pre
Limitations of OCL
Let's discuss limitations of using OCL language.
Learning OCL syntax can be challenging if we are unfamiliar with formal languages.
Despite its formal nature, OCL expressions can sometimes still be ambiguous or open to interpretation.
Integrating OCL with existing software development processes and tools can sometimes require workflow adjustments.
OCL uses textual notation, which might not be as expressive as graphical notations for certain constraints.
Maintaining and updating OCL constraints alongside code changes can become challenging as software evolves.
Conclusion
OCL serves as a powerful tool in software engineering, removing ambiguity in requirements and making them more precise. While improving software quality, its formal nature can be challenging for our understanding. Nevertheless, OCL contributes to building reliable and well-defined software systems.
Free Resources