Complete the Integration Architecture Packet

Each tool now has a documented contract, an entry in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) inventory, a defined permission scope, a gateway enforcement policy, a delegated identity model, and a risk tier with a corresponding oversight pattern. These components must be reconciled into a single integration architecture packet before the complete design can be reviewed.

Create a review packet for the case review assistant that makes every tool-integration decision inspectable and traceable. A reviewer must be able to trace each tool request and response end to end, from the user and agent runtime through the gateway and MCP server to the system of record. The packet must also enable the reviewer to verify authentication, identity delegation, and authorization; confirm least-privilege permissions and tenant isolation; and identify which actions require approval, who may approve them, and who owns each control.

Packet structure, audience, and acceptance questions

Write the packet for three primary audiences with different acceptance criteria. Platform and API owners need unambiguous integration boundaries, a stable name for every tool surface, and an owner for each MCP server, so an operational incident or change request has somewhere to land. Security reviewers need explicit trust boundaries, named identity actors and delegation steps, and a permission manifest that demonstrates least privilege and tenant isolation. Product governance reviewers need a risk tier per tool and a clear approval gate, so a high-impact action can never execute without its intended oversight path.

Keep the packet’s components small, but make each one answer a specific review question, ...