API Architectural Styles: REST, GraphQL, RPC
Learn the differences between key API architectural styles, REST, GraphQL, and RPC, and how to choose the right one for your system’s needs.
In any complex application, from a ride-sharing service tracking vehicles to a streaming platform suggesting our next show, countless independent services must communicate seamlessly.
The effectiveness of this communication has a direct impact on system performance, scalability, and maintainability. Choosing the right approach for these services to communicate with each other is one of the most critical decisions in building robust distributed systems.
This decision, API architectural styles, is a frequent topic in System Design interviews, where understanding the trade-offs is key. This lesson explores three dominant API architectural styles: REST, GraphQL, and gRPC. Let’s start by understanding what an architectural style means.
What is an architectural style?
An architectural style defines standardized rules and protocols for designing APIs, ensuring efficiency and consistency throughout the development process. Like communication patterns, these styles provide a structured approach, impacting the entire development life cycle.
When determining an architectural style, we must evaluate the characteristics that suit our design problem. Each style essentially serves as a template with constraints, so we must determine which one suits our requirements.
Let’s take a look at some of the properties we may wish to integrate:
Characteristic | Description |
Performance | An API style that performs well and does not become a bottleneck with a large influx of requests. |
Scalability | An API style to be easily scalable, such as adding more features and capacity to the back-end servers. |
Ease of development | Ease for developers often means opting for a simple and familiar style when implementing a solution. |
Portability | The ability to move an API architecture style from one software environment to another. |
Software maintenance support | There is ample support offered by the API providers. |
Moreover, choosing the right style depends on factors like API consumers, business needs, and functionality, as switching later can be complex. Before examining these modern APIs, it’s essential to understand the foundational communication protocol they evolved from, namely Remote Procedure Calls (RPC).
The RPC and evolution to modern APIs
The earliest challenge in distributed computing was making network communication feel simple.
Developers needed a way to execute code on a remote server as easily as calling a function locally. This led to the creation of the
This call is intercepted by a stub, which is a piece of code that acts as a local proxy for the remote service.
Under the hood, the client-side stub