Data storage flexibility can be one of the most important keys to your productivity as a software developer, and NoSQL databases are a great facilitator of that flexibility. They allow for high-speed data management and scalability, which makes them ideal for a variety of data structures and modern use cases, such as web applications and cloud-based services.
Today, we’ll go over the pros and cons of two services and discuss which you should use depending on your project goals and backend use cases. Given the number of NoSQL database services available, we’re narrowing our focus to two of the most popular: MongoDB and Amazon’s DynamoDB.
NoSQL stands for “non-SQL” or “not only SQL.” Structured Query Language (SQL) is a programming language developed in the early 1970s to allow programmers to interface with relational database management systems (RDBMS). This interface allowed them to organize data into tables that were then linked based on shared data.
In the era of Big Data, however, increasing demand for faster and more disparate use of large data sets led to the development of NoSQL or non-relational databases. Without the need to connect tables, developers could use NoSQL databases to divide search-query and data-storage workloads across multiple database servers, instead of relying on a single server. NoSQL databases have not rendered relational databases obsolete but simply provided a viable alternative for relevant use cases.
NoSQL databases are also considered distributed, meaning that data is stored on multiple local or remote servers. This means that, if some piece of the database is taken offline, the rest of the database remains functional and accessible.
Broadly speaking, there are four major types of NoSQL databases:
MongoDB is an open-source, document-oriented NoSQL database from MongoDB Inc. that began development in 2007. It uses BSON-formatted documents and files to store and manage data. MongoDB supports field, range query, and regular-expression search functions through this system.
Like other document-oriented databases, MongoDB doesn’t require matching data schemas across documents, which can provide flexibility that other databases lack. In addition, MongoDB Atlas is cloud-agnostic, meaning you could feasibly deploy it on any cloud provider (AWS, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Azure) or on premise without much issue. MongoDB is also compatible with a wide range of programming languages, including C, C#, Python, Ruby on Rails, Rust, and Scala, increasing provisioning options.
MongoDB is ideal if your project might need to scale quickly to meet increasing demands. Being schema-less, MongoDB supports adding document data to the database rapidly, which can speed up development. This is great if your project’s schema is prone to frequent changes, as it means you don’t have to reformat every document in the database after every change.
MongoDB is not without its drawbacks. Its schema-free design is flexible but also means you might experience some difficulty performing complex data transactions. In some cases, this can lead to data loss or corruption. And its document size is limited to 16MB, meaning larger data sets have to be broken up to fit in the database properly.
Try one of our 300+ courses and learning paths: MongoDB: The Complete Guide.
DynamoDB is Amazon’s proprietary NoSQL database service. First released in 2012, DynamoDB supports two types of NoSQL data: key-value and document-oriented. It has similar functionality to MongoDB, though it is only usable through Amazon Web Services (AWS), making it less than ideal for users who aren’t working with AWS services.
Given how common AWS is, there are plenty of reasons to use Amazon DynamoDB. Though less flexible in where you can deploy it, DynamoDB has smoother integration with other tools and services found in AWS. MongoDB allows users tighter control over their databases, but it also requires users to actively manage their configurations and infrastructure, which can take up precious development time. DynamoDB, however, uses AWS to manage updates, scaling, and availability, making the setup process quick and simple. You also won’t have to worry about keeping servers and backups running. Finally, AWS DynamoDB’s out-of-the-box security features are solid, thanks to being part of AWS and not being directly accessible via the internet.
Unfortunately, DynamoDB has more issues than just its limited deployment capability. Its querying capabilities aren’t great, and it only allows three data types for primary keys: string, number, and binary. (It does support many different data types for other attributes within a table.)
Furthermore, DynamoDB uses a throughput model for pricing and data processing by default. With this model, you estimate your read/write capacity needs before the service can appropriate the resources. In cases where you don’t really know your expected read/write volumes, you might under- or overestimate your needs, which can lead to batch-processing failures. Of course, you can use the on-demand pricing model to work around this, and DynamoDB will automatically accommodate your workloads as they ramp up or down. But that comes with the risk of bill spikes if your project’s traffic ends up higher than initially expected.
Try one of our 300+ courses and learning paths: Become an AWS Professional.
Queryoperation allows key-value and range queries, and scans provide another option for reading items in a table
We’ve talked a lot today about the pros and cons of MongoDB and Amazon DynamoDB and differences between the two services, but the ultimate question is, “Which one is right for you?” That answer depends on your project’s specific needs and resources.
If you’re already using AWS, DynamoDB’s simpler setup process and better integration tools make it the ideal choice in most scenarios. While MongoDB can be deployed on AWS the same as on any other cloud provider, it isn’t designed with AWS in mind like DynamoDB is. DynamoDB is also simply easier to use. While feature-rich, MongoDB has a bit of a learning curve, which can take up precious development time.
If you want to build a multi-cloud infrastructure or simply use the database on-premise, MongoDB is the best choice between the two. In truth, it’s the only choice in these cases since DynamoDB is only usable through AWS.
That said, this was only a sampling of these NoSQL databases. There’s so much more to learn and explore beyond MongoDB and DynamoDB through Educative courses and learning paths. If you want to discover more about DynamoDB and AWS, be sure to check out our Become an AWS Professional learning path. And our MongoDB: The Complete Guide course is ideal if you want to become an expert in all things Mongo.
Join a community of more than 1.6 million readers. A free, bi-monthly email with a roundup of Educative's top articles and coding tips.