Multi-cloud networking: Connecting clouds the right way#
Multi-cloud isn’t just about deploying services across providers — it’s also about how those services communicate. Networking is one of the most overlooked yet critical aspects of a successful multi-cloud strategy, and poor network design can lead to latency, downtime, or even security vulnerabilities.
Modern approaches to multi-cloud connectivity include:
Private interconnects: Direct, high-bandwidth links between clouds (e.g., AWS Direct Connect, Azure ExpressRoute, Google Cloud Interconnect) reduce latency, improve throughput, and help ensure compliance with data residency requirements.
Cross-cloud load balancing: Services like Google Cloud Load Balancing or multi-cloud proxies can intelligently route traffic based on region, cost, or performance.
DNS and routing strategies: Global DNS management and intelligent traffic routing ensure applications remain available and responsive, even during provider outages.
Unified observability: Tools like Datadog, Prometheus, and OpenTelemetry provide a single pane of glass for monitoring network traffic, latency, and cross-cloud dependencies.
Service meshes: Technologies like Istio or Linkerd can help manage east-west traffic between services, enforce policies, and provide zero-trust security models across cloud boundaries.
A strong network design not only improves performance but also reduces operational complexity and ensures business continuity across multiple environments.
Cost governance and FinOps: Controlling multi-cloud spend#
Running workloads across multiple clouds is powerful, but it can also get expensive fast. Without clear visibility and management, costs can spiral due to duplicated services, data transfer fees, or idle resources. That’s why FinOps — the discipline of cloud financial management — has become a key part of any multi-cloud approach.
Here’s what modern cost governance looks like:
Unified cost tracking: Use centralized platforms or cloud management platforms (CMPs) that aggregate costs across AWS, Azure, GCP, and other providers.
The FOCUS standard: This open specification normalizes billing data across clouds, making cost analysis easier and more accurate, especially for multi-cloud deployments.
Workload placement decisions: Continuously assess which cloud offers the best price-performance trade-off for specific workloads (e.g., storage-heavy on GCP, compute-heavy on AWS).
Budget alerts and anomaly detection: Automated alerts help teams catch unexpected spikes in usage and address inefficiencies before they become expensive.
Rightsizing and scheduling: Identify underutilized resources and scale them down, or use automation to shut down non-critical environments when not in use.
Integrating FinOps early ensures your multi-cloud environment remains cost-efficient, predictable, and aligned with business objectives.
Multi-cluster Kubernetes: Patterns and pitfalls#
The blog mentions Kubernetes, but running it across multiple clouds is more complex than simply deploying clusters. Successful multi-cloud Kubernetes requires careful planning around security, networking, storage, and governance.
Key considerations include:
Networking: Managing east-west traffic between clusters requires proper mesh networking or VPN solutions. Tools like Cilium or Calico can improve network visibility and control.
Storage: Data consistency is critical. Using cloud-agnostic storage solutions (like Portworx or Ceph) or leveraging CSI (Container Storage Interface) drivers ensures stateful services run reliably.
Identity and policy: Multi-cloud RBAC policies can drift over time. Centralized identity solutions like OIDC or cloud IAM federation reduce friction and improve security.
Failover design: Choose between active-active architectures for high availability or pilot-light setups for cost-effective disaster recovery. Managed services like Anthos (Google) or Azure Arc can help orchestrate multi-cluster strategies.
CI/CD and GitOps: Tools like ArgoCD and FluxCD help synchronize deployments across multiple clusters, ensuring consistency and minimizing human error.
Kubernetes is a powerful enabler of multi-cloud strategies, but it introduces its own challenges. Addressing them proactively is key to delivering reliable, scalable multi-cloud applications.
Regulatory change: The EU Data Act and portability#
Regulations are reshaping how companies approach multi-cloud. The EU Data Act, taking effect soon, requires cloud providers to make data portability easier and reduce switching costs for customers. This legislation aims to increase competition, reduce vendor lock-in, and promote interoperability.
This is already having a major impact:
Lower egress fees: Some providers are reducing or eliminating data transfer costs in Europe to remain compliant and competitive.
Simplified migration paths: New tools and APIs are emerging to streamline data export and workload migration between providers.
Stronger contractual guarantees: Cloud customers now have more leverage to negotiate SLAs that include data portability and exit clauses.
Improved transparency: Providers must disclose more details about pricing, performance, and interoperability to comply with the regulation.
These changes make multi-cloud adoption more attractive and feasible for businesses concerned about vendor lock-in or regulatory risks. They also emphasize the importance of building architectures that are data-portable from the start.
When multi-cloud isn’t the answer#
Multi-cloud has many advantages, but it’s not a silver bullet. In some cases, it can increase complexity, add cost, or stretch operational resources beyond what’s practical.
Situations where multi-cloud may not make sense:
Small-scale applications: If your product is early-stage or traffic is low, using one cloud simplifies development, operations, and billing.
Highly managed workloads: Relying heavily on proprietary services like AWS Lambda, Azure Cosmos DB, or BigQuery can make portability costly and unnecessary.
Strict compliance environments: Highly regulated industries (e.g., healthcare, government) may require certified environments available only on specific providers.
Limited team expertise: Operating across multiple platforms requires skills in IAM, networking, security, and orchestration — without them, complexity can outweigh benefits.
Cost inefficiency: If data transfer costs or duplication of services exceed the performance or reliability benefits, sticking to a single cloud may be the smarter choice.
A clear cost-benefit analysis, aligned with your organization’s goals and technical capacity, should guide whether multi-cloud is the right strategy. In many cases, starting with a single provider and evolving into multi-cloud later is a more practical path.